{"id":671,"date":"2025-03-01T16:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-03-01T16:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/01\/whats-the-point-of-all-these-anti-doge-lawsuits-fight-trumps-agenda-to-scotus-legal-experts-say\/"},"modified":"2025-03-01T16:00:21","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T16:00:21","slug":"whats-the-point-of-all-these-anti-doge-lawsuits-fight-trumps-agenda-to-scotus-legal-experts-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/01\/whats-the-point-of-all-these-anti-doge-lawsuits-fight-trumps-agenda-to-scotus-legal-experts-say\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s the point of all these anti-DOGE lawsuits? Fight Trump\u2019s agenda to SCOTUS, legal experts say"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">With countless legal challenges to the Trump administration&#8217;s federal spending actions, legal experts say plaintiffs in these suits are attempting to block President Donald Trump&#8217;s agenda as the courts navigate conceivably new territory.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">&#8216;I think this is a continuation of the warfare that we&#8217;ve seen over the past four-plus years during the Biden administration,&#8217; Zack Smith, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.<i>&nbsp;<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>&#8216;<\/i>The only difference now is that the instigators of the lawfare are outside of government, and they&#8217;re trying to use different advocacy groups, different interest groups to try to throw up obstructions to Donald Trump&#8217;s actions.&#8217;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration so far has become the target of more than 90 lawsuits since the start of the president&#8217;s second term, many of which are challenging the president&#8217;s directives.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs ranging from blue state attorneys general to advocacy and interest groups are specifically challenging Trump&#8217;s federal spending actions, including the administration&#8217;s attempt to halt federal funding to various programs and the Department of Government Efficiency&#8217;s (DOGE) efforts to slash excess government spending.<\/p>\n<p>Smith said he suspects these plaintiffs are attempting to &#8216;slow down&#8217; the Trump administration&#8217;s progress and agenda via these lawsuits &#8216;even if they know or suspect their lawsuits will ultimately not be successful.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>UC Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo told Fox News Digital that the plaintiffs in the spending cases are showing &#8216;political weakness&#8217; by seeking judicial recourse rather than going to Congress.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I think that what you&#8217;re seeing is political weakness, because, if they had popular support, they should go to Congress,&#8217; Yoo said. &#8216;That&#8217;s the branch for which the Founders expected to be responsible in containing or reacting to any expansion of presidential power that went too far.&#8217;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Despite the public outcry from conservatives that judges blocking Trump&#8217;s federal spending actions are &#8216;activist judges,&#8217; Yoo said the judges are &#8216;confused.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;There&#8217;s a lot of confusion going on in the lower courts,&#8217; he said. &#8216;I think they misunderstand their proper role.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Smith said that in the cases at hand, many judges are &#8216;interposing their own views of what [are] appropriate actions for the executive branch of government,&#8217; saying this is &#8216;not the proper role of a judge.&#8217;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;And yet you see some of these judges who are issuing these TROs, they&#8217;re being very aggressive, and they&#8217;re impeding on core executive branch functions when it really should be the president and his advisers who get to make important decisions,&#8217; Smith said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Smith added he hopes the Supreme Court is &#8216;taking a skeptical eye towards some of these actions by these judges.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Both Smith and Yoo said they expect these challenges to eventually make their way up to the Supreme Court, with Smith saying the high court &#8216;is going to have to confront some questions that it&#8217;s been trying to skirt for several years now.&#8217;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;This has to go to the Supreme Court because you&#8217;re seeing confusion in the lower courts about what is the proper procedural way to challenge spending freezes,&#8217; Yoo said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts paused a federal judge\u2019s order that required the Trump administration to pay around $2 billion in foreign aid funds to contractors by midnight. Smith called the move by Roberts &#8216;actually pretty stunning.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;And I think a reasonable interpretation of that would be that the justices, particularly the Chief Justice, is kind of sending a shot across the bow to some of these judges that, &#8216;Look, if you keep this up, we&#8217;re going to step in and intervene,&#8221; Smith said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Yoo said he expects the Trump administration to ultimately prevail on many of the suits launched against him, saying that &#8216;he&#8217;s really, in many ways, following the decisions of the Roberts Court itself about how far executive power goes.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Now, just because Trump won an election doesn&#8217;t mean he gets to do whatever he wants \u2014 he has to achieve his mandate through constitutional processes, which I think he&#8217;s doing,&#8217; Yoo said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;He&#8217;s litigating, he&#8217;s appearing at the Supreme Court, so he&#8217;s not ignoring the courts. He&#8217;s doing what you should do if you&#8217;re the president and you have the responsibility to execute the law,&#8217; Yoo continued.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><i>Fox News Digital&#8217;s Bradford Betz contributed to this report.&nbsp;<\/i><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With countless legal challenges to the Trump administration&#8217;s federal spending actions, legal experts say plaintiffs in these suits are attempting to block President Donald Trump&#8217;s agenda as the courts navigate conceivably new territory.&nbsp; &#8216;I think this is a continuation of the warfare that we&#8217;ve seen over the past four-plus years during the Biden administration,&#8217; Zack [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":672,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uscryptoinsiders.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}